April 14, 2004
The Honorable Orrin Hatch
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable Patrick Leahy
United State Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Re: Proposed Expansion of the CODIS Database – S. 1700
Dear Senators Hatch and Leahy:I am writing to express the concerns of the National
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) regarding provisions
contained in Title I of the Advancing Justice Through DNA Technology Act
of 2003 (S. 1700 and H.R. 3214) that would expand the federal Combined
DNA Index System (CODIS) database. NACDL strongly believes that the
CODIS database should not contain DNA samples from arrestees and persons
who have been charged but not yet convicted, juvenile offenders, and
persons convicted of misdemeanors.
By allowing for the inclusion of DNA samples from
those who have not been convicted of a crime, the legislation flouts the
presumption of innocence, misallocates resources, and encourages racial
profiling. While H.R. 3214 rightly prohibits inclusion of DNA samples
in CODIS from persons who have been arrested but not indicted, S. 1700
does not include an exception for arrestees. The U.S. National
Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence, in 2002, recommended against
including samples from arrestees on the grounds that there were already
hundreds of thousands of samples waiting to be analyzed, and state crime
laboratories do not have the capacity to process more samples.
Expanding DNA databases to include profiles from arrestees will produce
an identification system that reflects and possibly exacerbates racially
disparate arrest rates, in part because the inclusion of arrestees
provides an incentive for pretext and race-based arrests for the purpose
of DNA sampling.
The CODIS-related provisions grant tremendous
discretion to the states in determining whose DNA to submit to the
database. The states are only restricted by two exceptions: arrestees
(in H.R. 3214, not S. 1700) and persons who voluntarily submit their DNA
to be cleared of a crime cannot be included. These two exceptions do
not sufficiently limit the states. In fact, states could choose to
submit DNA samples from most any group of people, even those who are not
suspected of any wrongdoing.
Of particular concern is the authority of states to
submit DNA samples of juvenile offenders to CODIS. At least 33 states’
databases include the DNA of certain juvenile offenders in their state
DNA databases. With the passage of this legislation, the DNA data from
juvenile offenders in at least those 33 states would be included in the
federal CODIS database as well. Confidentiality and the practice of
expunging records are essential to the juvenile justice system’s
principal goals of treatment and rehabilitation. Policies that
undermine the confidentiality of juvenile proceedings distort this
rehabilitative model and threaten to stigmatize juvenile offenders.
Overall, NACDL is deeply concerned about the
unnecessary expansion of the CODIS database. With the collection of an
individual’s DNA comes the potential for gross misuse of that data. DNA
samples can reveal extremely sensitive, private information regarding
physical and mental traits and the likelihood of the occurrence of
genetic conditions and diseases. And as Justice Brennan wrote in his
concurrence in Whalen v. Roe,
“The central storage and easy accessibility of computerized data vastly
increases the potential for abuse of that information.” While
we recognize that DNA evidence is unparalleled in its scientific
ability to identify the guilty and protect the innocent, its treatment
is subject to human error and thus must be thoughtfully and strictly
regulated to prevent mishandling, contamination, and abuse.
Thank you for considering our concerns. Our hope is
that the legislation will be amended so as to exclude from the CODIS
database DNA samples from persons who are presumed innocent, juveniles,
and misdemeanants. If you have any questions or would like further
information regarding NACDL’s position, please contact Legislative
Director Kyle O’Dowd: (202) 872-8600 x226 or kyle@nacdl.org.
Sincerely,
E.E. (Bo) Edwards
President
cc: Members, Senate Judiciary Committee