Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Civil Liberties and Defense Groups Seek to Require Warrants for Police GPS Surveillance (NACDL News)
By IvanJ. Dominguez
NACDL News columns.
In what is widely expected to be one of the most important liberty and privacy cases in decades, on November 8, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument on the questions of “whether the warrantless use of a GPS tracking device on respondent’s vehicle to monitor its movement on public streets violated the Fourth Amendment” and “whether the government violated respondent’s Fourth Amendment rights by attaching the GPS tracking device to his vehicle without a valid warrant and without his consent.” The Justice Department argues that law enforcement should have the authority, unsupervised by any court, to install and use GPS technology to monitor and store the movements, 24/7, of whomever it targets, anywhere, anytime, without a warrant.
The case is United States v. Jones, No. 10-1259. In 2005, police investigating alleged drug activity attached the GPS device, without a valid and effective warrant, and used the GPS device to record the movements of Antoine Jones around-the-c
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.