Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Creating an Environment Where Jurors Want to Tell Lawyers Their Secrets
By Richard Kammen
Criminal defense lawyers are quite capable of having meaningful conversations. They have such conversations with friends, professional associates and clients, and with witnesses during pretrial interviews. On occasion, defense lawyers have meaningful conversations with police officers and judges. Clearly, as a group, criminal defense lawyers are capable of important, sensitive conversations in virtually all circumstances, professional and social.
However, many criminal defense lawyers have transformed jury selection, which is nothing more than a structured conversation, into a ritualized, stilted, lecture/cross-examination that has little positive communicative impact and may have a very negative personal impact. When the principles and attributes of successful conversation are analyzed and applied to jury selection, it is obvious that the following rule applies: Lawyers should conduct jury selection the same way they would conduct a conversation with individuals they meet
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.