Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
New Jersey's statute held unconstitutional: Prosecutors may not benefit from forfeiture cases
By David B. Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Judge G. Thomas Bowen has dealt a stunning blow to the"bounty hunter" system in place in about half the states, whereby state prosecutors receive a significant share of the forfeiture booty with few limitations on how they spend it. In a test case ably litigated by the Institute for Justice, a Washington, D.C.-based conservative public interest legal foundation, the court held that N.J.S.A. 2C:64-1 et seq. violates the due process clauses of the New Jersey and federal constitutions because it exceeds the constitutional limit on the financial or personal interest of officials charged with prosecutorial functions.1 Before I discuss the decision, I must digress to explain what the issue is and why it is so important.
The problem with ‘bounty hunter’ statutes
Forfeiture reformers, notably the NACDL, have long identified these statutory bounty hunter provisions as the root cause of most forfeiture abuse. They give prosecutors and law enforcement agencies too great an
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.