Condemning the Office of the Independent Counsel for Compelling Susan McDougal

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers condemns the action of the Whitewater Office of the Independent Counsel, led by Kenneth W. Starr, compelling Susan McDougal to re-appear before a Little Rock, Arkansas, grand jury where it was clear that she was still determined not to give testimony.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers that

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers condemns the action of the Whitewater Office of the Independent Counsel, led by Kenneth W. Starr, compelling Susan McDougal to re-appear before a Little Rock, Arkansas, grand jury where it was clear that she was still determined not to give testimony. Ms. McDougal had previously been imprisoned by a federal court for 18 months for declining to give testimony before that same grand jury. To imprison Ms. McDougal further, either by civil contempt of by an attempt to convict her for criminal contempt, would appear vindictive and ill-serve our nation's system of justice.

FURTHER, Susan McDougal, through her lawyer, for several months has raised -- with the U.S. District Court in Little Rock -- questions of conflict of interest and possible misconduct on the part of lawyers and agents of the Office of the Independent Counsel. She has sought a court hearing on these questions. There is a serious question as to whether the Office of the Independent Counsel will attempt to use contempt proceedings to block Ms. McDougal's obtaining an evidentiary hearing on these issues. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers condemns the use of contempt powers to impede judicial inquiry into issues relating to the integrity of the judicial process with respect to Ms. McDougal.

AND FURTHER, multiple issues of conflict of interest, the appearance of conflict, and possible misconduct have arisen with respect to the role of the Office of the Independent Counsel in the conduct of its investigation. In the interest of the integrity of America's judicial system, those issues must not be ignored. The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers urges a prompt, thorough and independent investigation into these critical concerns.

Santa Monica, California

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    March/April 2025 Cover

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    March/April 2025 Cover

    Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025)

    The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Live Event
    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar Cover

    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar

    "Making Sense of Science: Forensic Science, Technology & the Law"

    LOCATION: Sahara Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV
    DATES: April 24-26, 2025

  5. Trials, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: Case Law Review [Engage & Exchange]

    EXCLUSIVE NACDL MEMBER BENEFIT
    WHEN:
    Tuesday, April 29, 2:00-3:30pm ET / 11:00am-12:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products