Supporting Passage of Oregan Ballot Measure 94

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers endorses the passage of Ballot Measure 94 (2000) in Oregon.

WHEREAS Oregon Law has, since the passage in 1994 of Ballot Measure 11 [Ore. Rev. Stat. §137.700 et seq.], mandated that juveniles age 15 and older charged with certain offenses be automatically waived into adult court, and

WHEREAS Oregon Law has, since the passage in 1994 of Ballot Measure 11 [Ore. Rev. Stat. §137.700 et seq.], also required that all persons, juveniles or adults, be sentenced to serve lengthy minimum terms of imprisonment upon conviction, without the possibility of early release, and

WHEREAS Ballot Measure 94, an initiative measure sponsored by a grassroots organization of parents and friends of those treated unjustly by Ballot Measure 11 has been certified to the November, 2000 ballot, and

WHEREAS Ballot Measure 94 would repeal Ballot Measure 11 and allow prisoners sentenced in accordance with Ballot Measure 11 to be re-sentenced, and

WHEREAS, the passage of Ballot Measure 94 would stop prison expansion in Oregon, and

WHEREAS the passage of Ballot Measure 94 would return discretion in sentencing to Oregon judges, and

WHEREAS the passage of Ballot Measure 94 would also return discretion over juvenile transfer decisions, to Oregon judges, and

WHEREAS the passage of Ballot Measure 94 would also restore balance in the criminal justice system in Oregon, and

WHEREAS, the passage of Ballot Measure 94 in Oregon would send a message to other States and to Congress about the need for this kind of reform,

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers endorses the passage of Ballot Measure 94 (2000) in Oregon.

Presented by Board Member Richard Cremer 

La Jolla, California

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    March/April 2025 Cover

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    March/April 2025 Cover

    Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025)

    The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Live Event
    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar Cover

    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar

    "Making Sense of Science: Forensic Science, Technology & the Law"

    LOCATION: Sahara Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV
    DATES: April 24-26, 2025

  5. Trials, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: Case Law Review [Engage & Exchange]

    EXCLUSIVE NACDL MEMBER BENEFIT
    WHEN:
    Tuesday, April 29, 2:00-3:30pm ET / 11:00am-12:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products