Categorical Legislative Prohibitions on Defenses in Criminal Cases

NACDL has actively opposed legislative efforts in D.C. to categorically prohibit certain defenses in criminal cases.

It is NACDL’s position that categorical legislative prohibitions of defenses in criminal cases chip away at the foundational principles of our criminal justice system and undermine well-established rules of evidence that serve to balance principles of relevance and due process rights of accused persons. Legislation that focuses on limiting certain defenses and the consequential media attention that follows encourages the public to believe that trials are conducted by judges mechanically applying the law instead of through an adversarial process culminating in a fair jury verdict that is based on a thorough and searching consideration of all of the relevant evidence at trial.  

On February 16, 2019, after significant study by NACDL's Task Force on Defenses, NACDL's Board of Directors adopted a resolution "Concerning Categorical Legislative Prohibitions of Defenses in Criminal Cases."

On October 23, 2019, NACDL Past President Nina J. Ginsberg testified before the Washington, D.C. City Council Judiciary and Public Safety Committee regarding B23-409 and B23-435. The legislation "limits the scope of the defenses of heat of passion caused by adequate provocation, insanity, self-defense, defense of others, and defense of property if certain elements of the defense are based on the victim's actual or percieved gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation."

B23-0409 was signed into law by Mayor Muriel Bowser on January 15, 2021.

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/StayInformed/Champion/ChampionCovers/March-April-2025.jpg?ext=.jpg

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/amicus.png

    Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/newsrelease.png

    News Release ~ Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Event
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Learn/nacdlcleinstitute/2025_Post-Dobbs_Trial_Tactics_2025-02-26_v02_Event-Listing_2.jpg?ext=.jpg

    Trial Tactics for Pregnancy-Related Cases: Skills for Every Defender

    LOCATION: The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, TX
    DATE: May 16-17, 2025
    COST: FREE (registration is required)
    CLE Credit: Up to 14.5 credits 

  5. Webinar
    /assets/img/nacdl_og.png

    Collaborative Approaches to Appellate Defense: Recognizing Clients' Legal Expertise

    WHEN: Thursday, May 8, 3:00-4:30pm ET / 12:00-1:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products