Concerning Public Defense Delivery Systems

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers deems that where warranted by the jurisdictional population needs and caseload, a proper public defense delivery system should comprise institutional offices of full-time attorney staff as well as meaningful participation of private attorneys with equal access to training and resources necessary to provide effective criminal defense.

WHEREAS the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ mission is to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime, foster the integrity, independence, and expertise of the criminal defense profession, and promote the proper and fair administration of criminal justice, and

WHEREAS, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is dedicated to the support of quality indigent defense in state and federal courts, and

WHEREAS the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is devoted to ensuring that public defense delivery systems fulfill their Sixth Amendment obligations and that lawyers providing public defense services have the training, resources, and support to do so effectively, and

WHEREAS, the American Bar Association Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System include the position that “where the caseload is sufficiently high, the public defense delivery system consists of both a defender office and the active participation of the private bar,” and

WHEREAS, Gideon v. Wainwright and its progeny construe the fundamental Constitutional right to counsel to include both public defense offices as well as involvement of the private bar,

BE IT RESOLVED that the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers deems that where warranted by the jurisdictional population needs and caseload, a proper public defense delivery system should comprise institutional offices of full-time attorney staff as well as meaningful participation of private attorneys with equal access to training and resources necessary to provide effective criminal defense.


Resolution of the Board of Directors
October 28, 2017
Boston

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    March/April 2025 Cover

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    March/April 2025 Cover

    Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025)

    The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Live Event
    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar Cover

    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar

    "Making Sense of Science: Forensic Science, Technology & the Law"

    LOCATION: Sahara Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV
    DATES: April 24-26, 2025

  5. Trials, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: Case Law Review [Engage & Exchange]

    EXCLUSIVE NACDL MEMBER BENEFIT
    WHEN:
    Tuesday, April 29, 2:00-3:30pm ET / 11:00am-12:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products