FCPA Case: U.S. v. Esquenazi (Haiti Teleco)

Case materials from the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prosecution of Joel Esquenazi, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM.

In 2011, Joel Esquenazi, former president of Terra Telecommunications Corp., a Florida-based telecom, and his colleagues were convicted for their involvement in a scheme to bribe officials of Haiti’s state-owned telecom company. After a jury trial, they were found guilty of seven counts of violating the FCPA, 12 counts of money laundering, one count of money laundering conspiracy, and one count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA and wire fraud. Esquenazi received a sentence of 15 years imprisonment, the longest sentence ever to be given under the FCPA.

Esquenazi filed an appeal in the 11th Circuit, challenging the government’s interpretation of who counts as a “foreign official” under the FCPA.  Specifically, he argued that, when enacting the FCPA, Congress intended the phrase “foreign official” to include only traditional government officials, not employees of state-owned enterprises. The 11th Circuit held oral argument in October 2013 and issued an opinion affirming the convictions on May 16, 2014.

Esquenazi filed a petition for writ of certiorari on August 14, 2014. Professor Michael Koehler filed an amicus brief in support of the petition, as did the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF amicus). On October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari.

For a highly detailed timeline of the proceedings in this case, visit FCPAProfessor.com.

News

"Supreme Court declines hearing key FCPA case Esquenazi," Inside Counsel, October 7, 2014.

"Esquenazi and Rodriguez file petition for Supreme Court review," The FCPA Blog, August 15, 2014.

Appeals Court Clarifies Who Counts as a Foreign Official under the FCPA," The Wall Street Journal Law Blog, May 16, 2014.

"11th Circuit Affirms Esquenazi/Rodriguez Convictions - Defines 'Instrumentality'," FCPA Professor, May 16, 2014. [Opinion]

Continue reading below

"Appeals Judges Probe for Definition of 'Instrumentality' in Key FCPA Case," The Wall Street Journal, October 15, 2013.

"FCPA 'Foreign Official' Question Reaches Appellate Spotlight in Esquenazi Case," The Wall Street Journal, October 10, 2013.

"'Foreign Official' Challenge Reaches 11th Circuit," The Wall Street Journal, May 10, 2012.

"Haiti Teleco Roundup," FCPA Professor Blog, March 22, 2012.

Continue reading below

Featured Products

"Stunning Haiti Teleco Development," FCPA Professor Blog, August 29, 2011.

"Government's Vigorous Prosecution of FCPA Violators Continues When Jury Convicts Two Telecommunications Executives for Violations Relating to Haiti," Federal Securities Law Blog, August 8, 2011 [Additional coverage here].

Defense Filings

Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Joel Esquenazi v. United States, (filed August 14, 2014)

Brief of Appellant, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, No. 11-15331 (7th Cir. May 9, 2012) 

Defendant Joel Esquenazi’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2010) 

Government Filings

Second Superseding Indictment, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2012) 

Government’s Consolidated Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motions for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Sept. 12, 2011) 

Government’s Supplemental Response to The Standing Discovery Order, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Aug. 29, 2011) 

Superseding Indictment, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. July 13, 2011) 

Government’s Objection to Defendant Rodriquez’s Proposed Instruction Regarding “Foreign Official” and “Instrumentality,” United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. July 10, 2011) 

Government’s Response in Opposition to Defendant Esquenazi’s Corrected and Amended Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2010)  

Indictment, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-MGC (S.D. Fla. Dec. 8, 2009) 

Information for Juan Diaz, United States v. Juan Diaz, No. 09-cr-20346-JEM (S.D. Fla. April 22, 2009) 

Information for Antonio Perez, United States v. Antonio Perez, No. 09-cr-20347-JEM (S.D. Fla. April 22, 2009) 

Court Orders & Transcripts

Opinion Affirming Conviction, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 11-15331 (11th Cir. May 16, 2009)

Order of Dismissal, United States v. Cinergy Telecommunications, Inc., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2012) 

Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Oct. 14, 2011) 

Order Denying Defendant Joel Esquenazi’s (Corrected and Amended) Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Failure to State a Criminal Offense and for Vagueness, United States v. Joel Esquenazi, et al., No. 09-21010-CR-JEM (S.D. Fla. Nov. 19, 2010)

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/StayInformed/Champion/ChampionCovers/March-April-2025.jpg?ext=.jpg

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/amicus.png

    Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Elements/global/newsrelease.png

    News Release ~ Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Event
    /Nacdl/media/image_library/Learn/nacdlcleinstitute/2025_Post-Dobbs_Trial_Tactics_2025-02-26_v02_Event-Listing_2.jpg?ext=.jpg

    Trial Tactics for Pregnancy-Related Cases: Skills for Every Defender

    LOCATION: The University of Texas School of Law, Austin, TX
    DATE: May 16-17, 2025
    COST: FREE (registration is required)
    CLE Credit: Up to 14.5 credits 

  5. Webinar
    /assets/img/nacdl_og.png

    Collaborative Approaches to Appellate Defense: Recognizing Clients' Legal Expertise

    WHEN: Thursday, May 8, 3:00-4:30pm ET / 12:00-1:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free