Kathleen Ridolfi, Tiffany M. Joslyn, & Todd H. Fries, Material Indifference: How Courts Are Impeding Fair Disclosure in Criminal Cases, NACDL and the VERITAS Initiative (2014)
Brady Issue, The Champion Magazine (May 2013)
National Institute of Justice, Predicting and Preventing Wrongful Convictions (2013)
Bennett L. Gershman, Subverting Brady v. Maryland and Denying a Fair Trial: Studying the Schuelke Report, 64 Mercer L. Rev. 683 (2013)
Peter A. Joy & Kevin C. McMunigal, Supervisors, Subordinates, and Sanctions, 28-FALL Crim. Just. 64 (2013)
Janet Moore, Democracy and Criminal Discovery Reform After Connick and Garcetti, 77 Brook. L. Rev. 1329 (2012)
Joel B. Rudin, Taking Prosecutorial Misconduct 'Unseriously': Brady Violations and The Myth of Professional Accountability, The Champion (December 2012)
Ellen Yaroshefsky, New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure In Practice After Connick v. Thompson, 25 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 913 (2012)
David Keenan, Deborah Jane Cooper, David Lebowitz, & Tamar Lerer, The Myth of Prosecutorial Accountability After Connock v. Thompson: Why Existing Professional Responsibility Measures Cannot Protect Against Prosecutorial Misconduct, 121 Yale L.J. Online 203 (2011)
George A. Weiss, Prosecutorial Accountability After Connick v. Thompson, 60 Drake L. Rev. 199 (2011)
"Prosecutors Seldom Punished for Misconduct," by John R. Emshwiller and Evan Perez, The Wall Street Journal, October 4, 2010
Continue reading below
Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence: A Trial Strategy Guide
NACDL’s Pattern Cross-Examination for DNA and Biological Evidence will assist criminal defense practitioners in scoring points when cross-examining forensic experts in cases involving DNA and biological evidence. This resource contains thousands of questions that will help defense lawyers cross-examine challenging witnesses without reinventing the wheel with each new case. It includes pattern questions that can be used to dominate prosecution DNA experts and level the playing field at trial.
Cross-Examination of the Analyst in Drug Prosecutions (2nd Ed.) By James M. Shellow
Now in its second edition with some new material, James M. Shellow’s book offers what its title promises: ways of thinking about cross-examining the forensic analysts in drug cases. But the book is so much more than that. It offers a look inside the mind of one of the finest cross-examiners and defense lawyers the United States has produced in the last seventy years. This small book can inspire and direct you in making big changes in the way you defend your clients and think about the entire project of trying any case.
Justice For All, Justice Now White T-Shirt (Women’s)
This custom, vintage-faded NACDL t-shirt is 50% polyester, 25% cotton, and 25% rayon weighing 5.2 oz. and is lightwieght, flexible and soft, providing maximum comfort. It features the "Justice For All, Justice Now" slogan and Lady Liberty image on the front, with the NACDL logo on the back. Currently available in both men's and women's sizes in both black and white colors. View the full line-up of colors and sizes on our online store, as well as our other popular and best-selling t-shirt designs at: nacdl.org/store.
Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection - CD-ROM
NACDL’s Drug Cases Resource Materials Collection is the sweeping culmination of every single article of written materials ever published from each installment of NACDL's annual "Defending Modern Drug Cases" seminar. Totaling over 12,000 pages, this vast collection includes 12+ years of motions, briefs, reports, outlines, transcripts, case citations, scholarly articles, powerpoints and other written commentaries. This collection provides trial strategies and tactics you can immediately apply to your current cases.
Mental Illness & the Law: Addressing and Litigating Behavioral Health Disorders in Criminal Cases
Whether it is insanity, impairment, a disorder, or adolescent brain development; mental health and intellectual competence issues affect pretrial supervision, trial and sentencing, and your chances of successfully advocating for your impaired client. This training provides ideas and proven solutions to assist you in advocating for your client during trial, whether it be insanity defenses, jury selection, cross of expert witnesses, persuasion, or mitigation at sentencing.
Daniel S. Medwed, Brady’s Bunch of Flaws, 67 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1533 (2010).
Cardozo Law Review, New Perspectives on Brady and Other Disclosure Obligations: What Really Works?, 31 Cardozo L. Rev. 1943-2256 (June 2010).
Kathleen M. Ridolfi & Maurice Possley, Preventable Error: A Report on Prosecutorial Misconduct 1997-2009, Northern California Innocence Project, Santa Clara University School of Law (2010)
Works from Cardozo Law Review Symposium - New Perspectives on Brady and Other Disclosure Obligations: What Really Works? (2010)
Malia Brink,A Pendulum Swung Too Far: Why the Supreme Court Must Place Limits on Prosecutorial Immunity, 4 Charleston L. Rev. 1 (2009)
Bruce A. Green, Regulating Federal Prosecutors: Let There Be Light, The Yale Law Journal (2009)
American Bar Association, Crossing the Line: Responding to Prosecutorial Misconduct(2008)
James K. Robinson, Restoring Public Confidence in the Fairness of the Department of Justice’s Criminal Justice Function, 2-2 Harv. L. Pol’y Rev. 237 (2008)
Federal Judicial Center, Brady v. Maryland Material in the United States District Courts: Rules, Orders, and Policies (2007)
Bennett L. Gershman, Litigating Brady v. Maryland: Games Prosecutors Play, 57 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 13 (2007)
Jenny Roberts, Too Little, Too Late: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, The Duty to Investigate, And Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1097 (2003-2004).
Peter J. Henning, Prosecutorial Misconduct And Constitutional Remedies, 77-3 Wash. U. L.Q. 713 (1999)