Alasaad v. Wolf

Corrected Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmance.

Brief filed: 08/14/2020

Documents

Alasaad v. Wolf

1st Circuit Court of Appeals; Case No. 20-1077 & 20-1081

Prior Decision

Decision below 419 F.Supp.3d 142 (D. Mass. Nov. 12, 2019)

Argument(s)

The government's practice of warrantlessly searching travelers' electronic devices at the border violates the Fourth and Sixth Amendments. For many criminal defense lawyers, their work compels them to cross the border with their devices, which they use as their virtual law office. The attorney-client privilege and the Constitution protect the information on those devices. Requiring the government to get a warrant for device searches at the border would trigger the judicial supervision that is necessary to protect that information and associated rights.

Author(s)

Michael J. Iacopino, NACDL, Manchester, NH; Michael Price, Mukund Rathi, NACDL, Washington, DC.

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products