Hoffman v. United States

Brief of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae (on petition for a writ of certiorari).

Brief filed: 03/13/2019

Documents

Hoffman v. United States

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 18-1049

Prior Decision

Decision below 901 F.3d 523 (5th Cir. Aug. 24, 2018, as revised Aug. 28, 2018)

Argument(s)

The jury system is an imperfect protection against wrongful convictions. The “Equipoise Rule” helps courts to fulfill their duty to protect defendants’ right to be convicted by proof beyond a reasonable doubt. A court must enter a judgment of acquittal if no rational factfinder could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In cases where the evidence is in Equipoise, no rational factfinder could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Equipoise rule meaningfully protects defendants’ constitutional rights.

Author(s)

Amy Mason Saharia, Wendy Zorana Zupac, and Whitney G. Woodward, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; Jeffrey T. Green, NACDL, Washington, DC.

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products