Nijhawan v. Holder

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of petitioner.

Brief filed: 03/04/2009

Documents

Nijhawan v. Holder

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 08-495

Prior Decision

Decision below 523 F.3d 387 (3d Cir. 2008).

Argument(s)

Whether to avoid raising constitutional doubt or to provide fair warning under the rule of lenity, 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43)(M)(i) (defining an offense that involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim(s) exceeds $10,000) is a “dual use” statute requiring consistent interpretation in both criminal and immigration law contexts.

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

Iris E. Bennett, Anjan Choudhury and Michael A. Hoffman, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C. and David A. Newman, Jenner & Block, New York, NY.