United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.

Panarella pled guilty to a one-count superseding information, which charged him as an accessory after the fact to honest services wire fraud based on a theory of undisclosed self-dealing.  Panarella exhausted his direct appellate rights and, in light of the Skilling decision, petitioned for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the All Writs Act, on this one count. On July 29, 2011, the Court granted Panarella's petition.