The right to confront witnesses is a bedrock principle of a defedant's Sixth Amendment rights, however the constitutional analysis of whether that right has been violated has changed in recent years. In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the Supreme Court fundamentally changed the manner in which the right to confrontation should be analyzed. Prior to Crawford, courts could admit out-of-court statements if the hearsay statement fell within a “firmly-rooted exception” or if it bore “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 66 (1980). The Crawford decision rejected the reliability test as a basis for admissibility and instead looked first to whether the statement is "testimonial evidence." If the statement is testimonial, the Confrontatation Clause renders the statement inadmissible unless 1) the declarant was unavailable AND 2) the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
The Court nevertheless carved out some exceptions to the right to confrontation:
1) Wrongdoing: If a witness becomes unavailable as a result of the defendant's actions, the right is forfeited.
2) Dying declaration: See Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011) discussion of dying declaration as an historical exception to the right to confrontation.
The Court clarified Crawford’s “testimonial” requirement in Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006) and Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009). In Davis, the Court ruled that statements made in a 911 call and in the course of an emergency were not "testimonial" in nature and were not generated for the purpose of being used in a future prosecution. Given that the 911 call is not testimonial, the Crawford analysis does not apply.
In Melendez-Diaz, the Court considered whether a forensic lab report that was prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is “testimonial” evidence and therefore subject to the Crawford test for admissibility. The Court found that a chemist’s drug-analysis affidavit falls “within the core class of testimonial statements” identified by Crawford, because it was “functionally identical to live, in-court testimony, doing precisely what a witness does on direct examination.”
An important corollary to the right to confront accusers, is the right to test the reliability and credibility of those witnesses through the process of cross-examination.
The right of cross-examination is more than a desirable rule of trial procedure. It is implicit in the constitutional right of confrontation, and helps assure the “accuracy of the truth-determining process.” It is, indeed, “an essential and fundamental requirement for the kind of fair trial which is this country’s constitutional goal.”
Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 295 (1973)
Cross-examination is a powerful tool that can be used to bolster a party's theory of the case, contradict evidence introduced through the opposing party's witness, and ultimately to discredit the testimony of a witness. However, it can be a double-edged sword for litigators because cross-examination may "open the door" to damaging redirect examination that would have ordinarly be barred if elicited on direct examination.
Continue reading below
Cross-Examination Trial Pack
NACDL’s new Cross-Examination Trial Pack includes three of our best-selling Cross-Examination resources: “Damage Control: Situational Cross-Examination Techniques Trial Guide”, "Ultimate Cross 2.0: Audio Recordings & Written Materials" and "Sample Cross-Examination Questions."
This masterful collection of cross-examination resources provide countless tips, techniques and strategies for a variety of criminal case-specific scenarios. Learn to cross-examine a variety of trial witnesses!
Death Investigation: Forensic Pathology in the Courtroom and Cause & Manner of Death (2022)
This unique program provides criminal defense lawyers with an accurate and clear overview of forensic pathology and the countless factors to consider in a death investigation and will methodically explain what happens during an autopsy to determine cause and manner of death.
You'll uncover the different types of medicolegal death investigations, what to request from your MDI expert, quality benchmarks for accreditation and certification, guidelines and standards, common terminology and frequently asked questions.
The Psychology of Persuasion & Storytelling for Criminal Defense Lawyers
This Trial Resource Guide is a masterful collection of practical tips, techniques and strategies focused solely on using the arts and sciences of persuasion to improve your storytelling skills at trial.
You'll learn how to master the ability to communicate with juries, deliver powerful openings and closings, perform convincing cross-examinations, use effective courtroom choreography and non-verbal communication, identify and develop the optimal theme and theory for your case, and offer compelling arguments during mitigation and sentencing.
Zealous Advocacy in Sexual Assault & Child Victims Cases (2022)
Defending charges of sexual assault and child abuse can be daunting — but with the right tools, it doesn’t have to be.
Every year, NACDL identifies the hottest topics and most pressing issues when defending these cases, and brings-in nationally-renowned lawyers and experts to help you prepare for battle. This year’s 13th Annual Defending Sex Cases training program is our best yet; packed with topics and speakers you won’t want to miss!
If you are interested in obtaining Training and Technical Assistance (TTA) related to strengthening Sixth Amendment protections in your jurisdiction, click the link below.
|APPLY FOR TTA HERE|